I just came across this lovely passage from G. K. Chesterton's introduction to it:
We go for a particular novel to Dickens as we go for a particular inn. We go to the sign of the Pickwick Papers. We go to the sign of the Rudge and Raven. We go to the sign of the Old Curiosities. We go to the sign of the Two Cities. We go to each or all of them according to what kind of hospitality and what kind of happiness we require.
Rather unfortunately, Chesterton goes on to argue that Martin Chuzzlewit is the exception to the rule, thanks to its "melancholy" feel. Still, the imagery is brilliant and, I think, profoundly true.
And Chesterton does go on to say, "He poured into this book genius that might make the mountains laugh, invention that juggled with the stars." So there's that!
I don't remember the book too well, but I do think the miniseries from the '80s (which is quite close to the book) is very eerie. Great story though--its "melancholy" doesn't get in the way of its excellence, in my opinion. :) I love rewatching Martin Chuzzlewit, and maybe the fact that the conflict/atmosphere is intense has something to do with it.
Posted by: Marian | July 24, 2011 at 10:30 PM
I think that our blogs have a significant overlap! It's period drama-orientated and the one and only Dickens has featured heavily and will continue to do so. Check it out at - www.perioddramaking.blogspot.com and do keep up the good, Dickensian work! Or, I'll swing for ya, workus!
Posted by: Brian McManus | July 26, 2011 at 12:59 PM
We are very glad to see you, Brian, very! :-) Thanks for dropping by. Your blog looks fascinating and I look forward to exploring it more!
Posted by: Gina | July 27, 2011 at 08:10 AM