Help end world hunger

« Happy 200th, Anthony Trollope! | Main | Are we talking about the same Charles Dickens? »

April 26, 2015

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I Suspect it's not a matter of intelligence or even literacy....I think the language and style has changed. People back then were used to a somewhat flowery narration style and had a different way of saying things...they expected to hear different sentences than we do. Also, listening and reading are totally different skills. Tone of voice, and body language play a big part in helping you understand what you are hearing, even if you aren't grammatically up to snuff and have a bad vocabulary. Said students would probably get a Shakespeare play if it was read to them but you lose that little cheat if you silent read it.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

WELCOME

  • A blog for all things Dickens -- quotes, reflections, adaptations, references and tributes from other authors, and more.

Happy 200th, Mr. Dickens!

Blog powered by Typepad