Not everyone would agree, but Dr. John Mark Reynolds demonstrates that Dickens makes a pretty convincing argument for basic feminism -- "the equal and full humanity of women and men before Providence" -- in Dombey and Son.
Post a comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
I totally disagree with Dr. Reynold's assumptions and would argue a strong case to the contrary. For Dickens was that most inveterate of misogynists, since not merely a card-carrying, patriarchal product of his own times, but one who rather dangerously exhibited strong proclivities towards a Lolita Complex and sadism, when it came to his dealings with women.
I smile as I write this; recalling the insight propounded by Dickens himself in "Our Mutual Friend," concerning the feminine instinct for uneeringly discerning the unpalatable underbelly of a frog, sans any need whatsoever to overturn that clammy specimen. For according to the scornful declaration made by Mrs. Sophronia Lammle - utterances later mused upon with a similarly laconic weariness: "Men are very wise in their way...but they have wisdom to learn...."
Posted by: D. J. Payne | January 28, 2017 at 07:56 PM